Completely off-topic, but as threads develop they tend to diverge a lot due to references by posters (eg the war, following my Sir Norman Wisdom film clip post):
Regarding Coutts Bank - my first job after grammar school was as a cashier at Barclays (I hated it. The best thing I did was to go to college to study what was the "coming thing" back then, computers). I don't know if my observations are correct, or my assumptions were shared by others in the banking industry, but there seemed to be an element of class structure pertaining to what bank you were a customer of. At the top of the mainstream banks I would say that would be Lloyds, followed by Barclays, then Midland, and NatWest (formerly National Westminster), and lastly Co-op Bank.
Then there was Coutts. I think one or more of my bank managers may have instructed me that it wasn't necessary to go through the usual checks of verifying with their branch that they had sufficient funds to cover a cheque they wanted to cash, as long as they had identification. The cheques themselves were very understated, with "Olde English" (for want of a better term) font, usually on a bone or parchment coloured background. The customer was invariably well dressed and self assured. This was in "the provinces", and there probably wasn't a local Coutts branch they could go to, so they picked the nearest thing. I don't know how it was in London.
Back in those days, you had to have a reference of sorts even to open an account at Barclays, so I imagined Coutts customers were virtually members of the aristocracy, and/or were extremely well off. At any rate, none of their cheques bounced.
Now I live in the U.S. where you can open a bank account if you have a pulse. Of course then you get gouged with fees for using other banks' cashpoint machines, and anything else they can think of, but that's another story.
